You will be redirected to the website of our parent company, Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH: www.schoenherr.eu
The increasing digitalization of the working world means that employees frequently remain professionally reachable even during their vacation. In particular work phones increasingly blur the boundaries between working time and leisure time. The degree of availability ranges from occasional contact to permanent availability. But what questions arise in such cases, particularly with regard to the recuperative purpose of vacation leave, working time, and data protection risks?
The starting point for the legal assessment is the statutory purpose of vacation leave: the Austrian Vacation Act (Urlaubsgesetz) primarily envisages the physical and mental recovery of employees. This recuperative purpose is not merely a matter of national law but is also safeguarded under EU law. The CJEU consistently emphasizes in its case law that the entitlement to paid annual leave constitutes a particularly significant principle of EU social law.
The question – discussed with increasing intensity particularly against the backdrop of advancing digitalization – of whether employees have a right to non-availability during their recreational leave remains unresolved at the highest judicial level. Clauses in employment contracts requiring employees to remain available at short notice even during vacation should, as a matter of principle, be avoided. In an older decision, the Higher Regional Court of Vienna (OLG Wien) qualified an employer's request to an employee to remain available for telephone enquiries during vacation as an implied revocation of the vacation agreement (OLG Wien 34 Ra 121/92).
Particularly in the case of higher-qualified activities, the boundaries between mere availability and actual work performance are increasingly blurred. While merely carrying a work phone is, in itself, still unproblematic, the attentive monitoring or even handling of work-related matters will regularly constitute work performance. The more influential the employee's position, however, the more it may be argued that a certain degree of availability during vacation is reasonable. Whether availability clauses may be permissible in individual cases therefore depends significantly on the specific activity and position of the employee and should be examined with caution on a case-by-case basis.
In addition to employment law issues, data protection risks are increasingly coming to the fore. Particularly in the case of workation models, access to company data frequently occurs via public Wi-Fi networks or insufficiently secured connections.
From the perspective of the GDPR, however, the employer remains obliged, irrespective of the place of work, to ensure appropriate technical and organizational measures for the protection of personal data. Practically relevant points of concern include, in particular, access via unsecured networks, lack of encryption, or the use of private end devices. These issues can be effectively addressed through internal policies on mobile work and technical precautions.
The combination of vacation and work also raises numerous legal questions. The following points should in any event be considered when enabling employees to work from vacation locations:
Helene
Schnabl
Attorney at Law
austria vienna